当前位置

首页 > 英语作文 > 英语作文范文 > GRE作文3分容易考吗

GRE作文3分容易考吗

推荐人: 来源: 阅读: 1.62W 次

GRE考试中,写作部分的总分值为6分,那么如果作文想要拿到3分的成绩,是容易还是难呢?具体的在备考的过程中,同学们应该怎么备考,才能够拿到GRE写作3分以上的成绩呢?下面小编为大家整理了详细的内容,供大家参考!

GRE作文3分容易考吗

GRE作文3分容易考吗?

在新GRE作文中的另一个普遍问题是写作速度太慢,这显然是因为在考试前所作的准备不够充分。GRE考试的写作除了开头段和结尾段,中间一般应该写三段。但是考生在规定时间内往往只能写两段,而且字数也不够,只能写400字左右。GRE写作虽然没有字数要求,但是一篇较好的、成熟的,能够充分展示自己观点的GRE作文,一般应在600字左右,或者是600字以上。由此可见,一篇400字左右的文章在内容上是不够充实的。

多准备针对性素材提升论述说服力

在备考过程中要多准备例子,并把它们一一写下来,进行分类。一个例子往往可以应对好几个同类的题目,这样做是效率最高的办法。

坚持写作练习克服畏难情绪

我们都害怕写作文,想到要练习写一整篇文章,往往就没有了信心。其实我们可以从练习写作开头段,然后设计文章的提纲开始。写开?a href="">范文芄蝗梦颐且郧崴梢坏愕男那樽攀諫RE写作的准备,并且迅速了解所有的题目,因为GRE的题目数量是固定的。

储备积极词汇,用时得心应手。从备考的开始就要着手增加working vocabulary, 当然也包含词组,成语。平时背的词汇往往只是看到它能知道其中文的某个翻译意思,但是我们却不能灵活运用这些词汇进行表达,更不用说在短暂的GRE写作考试时间内用它们遣词造句了。

ETS官网GRE作文3分范文赏析

As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.

Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

Essay Response — Score 3

There is no current proof that advancing technology will deteriorate the ability of humans to think. On the contrary, advancements in technology had advanced our vast knowledge in many fields, opening opportunities for further understanding and achievement. For example, the problem of dibilitating illnesses and diseases such as alzheimer's disease is slowing being solved by the technological advancements in stem cell research. The future ability of growing new brain cells and the possibility to reverse the onset of alzheimer's is now becoming a reality. This shows our initiative as humans to better our health demonstrates greater ability of humans to think.

One aspect where the ability of humans may initially be seen as an example of deteriorating minds is the use of internet and cell phones. In the past humans had to seek out information in many different enviroments and aspects of life. Now humans can sit in a chair and type anything into a computer and get an answer. Our reliance on this type of technology can be detrimental if not regulated and regularily substituted for other information sources such as human interactions and hands on learning. I think if humans understand that we should not have such a reliance on computer technology, that we as a species will advance further by utilizing the opportunity of computer technology as well as the other sources of information outside of a computer. Supplementing our knowledge with internet access is surely a way for technology to solve problems while continually advancing the human race.

Reader Commentary for Essay Response — Score 3

This essay never moves beyond a superficial discussion of the issue. The writer attempts to develop two points: that advancements in technology have progressed our knowledge in many fields and that supplementing rather than relying on technology is "surely a way for technology to solve problems while continually advancing the human race." Each point, then, is developed with relevant but insufficient evidence. In discussing the potential of technology to advance knowledge in many fields (a broad subject, rife with possible examples), the writer uses only one limited and very brief example from a specific field (medicine and stem-cell research).

Development of the second point is hindered by a lack of specificity and organization. The writer creates what might be best described as an outline. The writer cites a need for regulation/supplementation and warns of the detriment of over-reliance upon technology. However, the explanation of both the problem and solution is vague and limited ("Our reliance ... can be detrimental. If humans understand that we should not have such a reliance ... we will advance further"). There is neither explanation of consequences nor clarification of what is meant by "supplementing." This second paragraph is a series of generalizations that are loosely connected and lack a much-needed grounding.

In the essay, there are some minor language errors and a few more serious flaws (e.g., "The future ability of growing new brain cells" or "One aspect where the ability of humans may initially be seen as an example of deteriorating minds"). Despite the accumulation of such flaws, the writer's meaning is generally clear. Thus, this essay earns a score of 3.

GRE作文高分的备考复习经验

第一,文章开始点明中心句。

在每一段开始的第一行,最好能明确地表达你想说什么,也就是中心句。

这做法虽然死板,但往往有奇效。特别是对自己逻辑推理不是很有信心的各位,说清楚了,没说全面总比说都没说清楚要好。

第二,写作这个东西其实是相通的。

我们中的很大一部分在高考结束后恐怕很少再写这么长的,同时主题又相对深刻的文字。英文只是一个表达方式,而论证过程则和中文没有任何区别。如果实在觉得难以上手,不妨先试试写一篇自己认为很深刻的中文文章看看。在逻辑和思想方面,这样的训练方式会有奇效,同时对于心理是一个不小的鼓舞。

第三,有关范文。

范文是一定要看的,看什么。我建议,开始的时候,不要纠结于某某单词的某某用法,大不了你写的时候不用就是了。要大略的看,看作者是怎么展开题目,从哪几个方面入手,各自怎么论证的。

很重要的一点是,不要迷信范文。没有任何证据表明你看到的这篇范文出自一位逻辑学大师的手,即便确实如此,对于同一问题有不同的见解这是再正常不过的事情。思路可以借鉴,但千万不要僵化。

与此本质相同的另一个方法是,请别人改作文,就观点改或就文字改,按个人情况取舍。

GRE写作复习备考书籍参考  

GRE写作宝典(第一版)

评注:第一版尽管粗糙,但是素材全,练习好,而且今天的很多重考题都在该书范围内,尤其是占全书1/3之多的“写作工具箱”是准备写作的一项利器。

新GRE作文高分书籍参考,《新GRE写作官方题库与范文》无疑就是一本攻克GRE作文必备书籍。

《新GRE写作官方题库与范文》不仅完整收录了新G考以来的所有写作题目,而且撰写的高度符合官方标准的范文,原汁原味,流畅地道,成为广大考生的杀G必备!

书中结合ETS公布的最新官方题库,从考生在备考过程中面临的实际难题出发,对于如何写作Issue和Argument进行了详细的讲解,并为考生精心解读最新GRE写作题库,点拨题目特点,分析成文思路和脉络。题库中的每道题目都提供了由美籍教师精心撰写的高分参考范文,考生可细细研习,学构思、品词句,体会将学到的技巧运用到实际写作中去,从而做到举一反三、触类旁通。

此外,书中还为考生提供了Issue题库以及Argument题库的交叉索引,方便考生查阅。附录中提供的常用连接词也可帮助考生在写作时增强文章的逻辑性,使文章更加连贯流畅。